Gauteng High Court seeks input on draft directive to address civil court backlog

The Gauteng Division of the High Court is calling on inputs to its suggestions on how to alleviate the congested civil trial rolls

The Gauteng Division of the High Court is calling on inputs to its suggestions on how to alleviate the congested civil trial rolls

Published 19h ago

Share

The Gauteng Division of the High Court, in a draft directive, is calling for the input of law bodies, practitioners, and litigants in general, for comment and suggestions on plans by this division to alleviate the congested civil court roll.

The Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) explained that the directive is aimed at alleviating the backlogs and constraints that currently plague the division’s Civil Court roll, which at present has trial dates issued as far ahead as 2031.

This situation is untenable and infringes on the right to access to courts as guaranteed by Section 34 of the Constitution. The effect of the presence of these matters on the trial roll prejudices matters that genuinely deserve judicial attention by means of a trial, the OCJ said.

It added that expedited litigation is in the best interest of the litigants involved; hence, mediation has been selected as the option to fulfil this objective.

In an attempt to deal with the case backlog, the division has, in consultation with stakeholders, made efforts to find solutions to mitigate these challenges.

One of these solutions has culminated in the development of the draft directive on mandatory mediation. The option of mandatory mediation is informed by the fact that more than 85% of trial matters that have waited years to be on the trial roll always settle upon the arrival of the trial date.

According to the OCJ, this clearly demonstrates that the majority of matters that are congesting the trial roll should have been resolved a long time ago.

The office pointed out that the “directive”, which is currently circulating among the legal fraternity, is at this stage only a draft for comment.

It explained that as contemplated in Section 173 of the Constitution, the Judge President - Judge President Dunstan Mlambo in this case - shall exercise policy oversight over the manner in which matters are brought before the division for hearing.

This empowers the judge president to put in place measures that will promote the efficient administration of justice in the division.

“It should be noted that the draft directive is aimed at the Civil Court Roll. Further to this, all efforts have been made to ensure that the draft directive does not detract or impede any established rules of court,” the OCJ said.

The deadline for submission is April 3, and it should be sent to [email protected]

[email protected]